The article I chose for my
journal analysis was, Carless Girls and
Repentant Wives: Gender in Postwar Classroom Films. This journal was
written by Megan Stemm-Wade and in it, she discusses the social hygiene
movement of the 1940s thru the 1970s and the impact it had on popular culture
at that time. Social hygiene is described in the reading as an innovation of
its era to “regulate the social behavior of the viewer” (pg. 1). The
argument made by Stemm-Wade was that the social hygiene movement specifically
focused on young women during a time in history where their influence on, and
contribution to, society was considered minimal, or temporary while the men
were at war.
The author’s main key points are
broken up into four sections: Mental
Hygiene – From the Battlefield to the Classroom; Repress and Deny: Films on
Dating; Learning to Be June Cleaver: Films on Marriage; and The Office Wife: Career Training Films. To
briefly summarize each, the ‘mental hygiene’ section discusses how the social
hygiene movement came about. The author notes that as men were returning home
from WWII, their children were rebelling, so to speak, with dancing, drinking,
and young marriages causing a spike in divorce rates. Not knowing what to do
with this ‘lost generation’, educators resorted to the original mental hygiene
that was used on soldiers of WWI to teach them “how to remain ‘clean’ morally,
as well as ‘physically’” (pg. 4), by establishing the social-hygiene myth. The
belief behind this was that it would create a ‘well-bred’ young person. The
‘repress and deny’ section talks about the types of films created and the
messages they delivered to their audience. For the next section, ‘learning to be June
Cleaver’, I think the message behind it is implied in the name. In this
section, Stemm-Wade discusses the message behind the films and how they were
applied to a woman’s role in marriage. In the last section, ‘The Office Wife’,
discusses the films, known as ‘marriage readiness’ and ‘career-training’, which
were part of the student curriculum to teach and prepare young girls for their
minimal roles in society as secretaries or subservient wives. In this section,
the author points out that these films ‘showed their audiences that
submissiveness disguised as courtesy, and emotional repression masquerading as
etiquette were the path to career success” (Stem-Wade, pg. 13).
Throughout the reading, the
author argues that social hygiene was developed for, and directed toward,
teenage girls. The author supports this argument through discussing the various
films that were mentioned under each of the sections listed above. The author
first supports this argument by drawing a correlation to the era in which they
were first introduced. According to the reading, the social hygiene movement
came about when the men went off to war and the women were left behind to fill
their shoes. The decade prior to the introduction of social hygiene films in
classrooms, there was an influx in the number of women entering the workforce
and dominating roles that were previously held by their male-counterparts;
however, once the war was over, she argues that women’s roles were diminished
once again because the men were now home from war, but, ultimately, the women
did not give up their role in society so easily. She supported this argument
with the statistic that, “by the end of the 1950s, 40% of women over the age of
sixteen held jobs” and the remaining women that remained home, “were not
content with simply retrofitting their newfound independence to family life as
it had been before” (pg. 2). Educators were fearful of this changing culture,
so to curve this downward spiral, she argues that social hygiene films were
created to deliver a similar hidden message, which was to teach young girls that
their current and future place in society was to be submissive to men in all things
but sex and be the attractive, non-working housewife that a woman should
be. Stemm-Wade claimed that most films
under the ‘June Cleaver’ section carried the same three main messages, which
were: “Being attractive is essential to catching a man; once caught, it is
solely the wife’s responsibility to keep the marriage running smoothly; and
nothing will sabotage a marriage as surely as a wife with a career” (pg. 8). I
have never seen one of these social hygiene films, myself, but it is
interesting to compare what she is describing with television shows of that
era. Popular culture at that time was based on this ideology that the wife
stays home to maintain order in the house, while at the same time, wearing an
apron, skirt, low-heeled shoes and maintaining perfectly kept hair and make-up.
It is evidenced by shows like “Leave it to Beaver” and “I Love Lucy”.
Another hidden message in these
films, and the connotation Stemm-Wade claimed they had, were that females
should “repress their sexual desires” and it’s their responsibility for “making
the mature choice by turning down the male ‘in a friendly and appealing way’”
(pg 5). Example of this can be seen in such films as, Name Unknown and Girls Beware; both produced by Sid Davis. In these
films, it is made evident that if the female acts on her desires or seeks them
out through less-wise decisions, if she were to get raped or killed, she would
deserve it. No blame would be placed on the male, as the male is more or less
doing what is expected of his kind. The following is pulled from the 1961 and
1971 version of Girls Beware, which
further supports the author’s claims: “Edie
dates an older guy who ‘has problems with girls his own age’ that knocks her up
under a tree in the park. She is soon sent off to juvenile hall for getting
herself into trouble where she will have ‘plenty of time to think about whether
a few minutes of showing off or feeling sharp is worth a lifetime of regrets!’”
(pg. 6).
The author continues to relate
these curriculum films of that era to the repression of women’s roles in
society. “In a culture that was not thrilled to have women in the workplace,
career-training social hygiene films showed them how to be the proper kind of
workingwoman. Whether through office training, lessons on marriage, or dating
instruction, the roles of women in social hygiene films were hard to miss”
(pgs. 12 and 15). Stemm-Wade’s article may seem cynical throughout but she is
simply stating the facts of the perception and ideologies of popular culture of
that time and provides support through various excerpts of these films. She
supports her claims through examples of the films created and how the roles of
both men and women were depicted. At that time in history, these social-hygiene
films supported the myth that a woman’s role in society was minimal, at best,
and subpar to her life partner’s. Much of the American dream back then was that
the man worked outside the home to support the financial needs of his wife and
kid(s) and the woman worked inside the home to support the emotional needs of
her husband and children. Educators saw that popular culture was quickly
changing (or a better term, evolving) on the heels of WWII and to head it off,
they created these films to try and keep it in check. Today in popular culture,
the majority of households are dual-income, or many are single-income with the
woman working outside the home and the husband in. In popular culture today, if
these films were shown in our schools, there would be equality issues,
especially with regard to teaching the female to be subservient to her husband.
Today, popular culture is striving more and more toward equality among all and,
despite the attempts of educators and film makers of that era, women are just
as much a contribution to today’s society as any man is. Though learning about
these films some 60 years later, I think it is important to see what was
driving pop culture of that time and see how it has evolved since then,
especially being a woman. I just heard on the evening news last night that the
first three Marine women ever just graduated from infantry training. I wonder
what the educators of the 50s and 60s would have to say about that.
References:
Stemm-wade, Megan. "Careless
Girls and Repentant Wives: Gender in Postwar Classroom Films." The
Journal of Popular Culture 45.3 (2012): 611-27. Franklin University
Nationwide Library. Web. 18 Nov. 2013. <http://0-journals.ohiolink.edu.olinkserver.franklin.edu/ejc/pdf.cgi/StemmWade_Megan.pdf?issn=00223840&issue=v45i0003&article=611_cgarwgipcf>.